A lot of definitive statements.
Tell me how AI has “hacked” the bitcoin blockchain.
Tell me how 95% of all dollar denominated transactions are not dependent on the grid.
If you don’t want to buy into the whole Bitcoin thing, thats fine. But using definitive false statements or misleading ones at best, is simply disingenuous.
You are correct. You don’t “hack” a blockchain. I suppose you could break one if you setup enough servers to get to 50.1% of provenance. Or maybe not. What do I know. More than Armstrong at least.
People think AI is like the robot from Lost in Space ( the original ).
Thank you.