[proxy_user]

And mere insults are not usually legally actionable.

[TangoLimaSierra]

I would think being called a “thief” would be sufficient.
Now Jamaal has to show proof or lose.

[MRadtke]

But hasn’t President Trump been successful in similar lawsuits?

[Texas Fossil]

“not usually legally actionable”

Elon Musk is not the usual person to sue.

And in this case, it is warranted.

I suspect the money behind this terrorist acts against Musk’s companies, will be charged and LOSE.

[usconservative]

And mere insults are not usually legally actionable.

Calling someone a thief isn't an insult, it's an ACCUSATION. Absent any proof, that's actionable.

Calling someone a NAZI is considered HATE SPEECH (If you remember, the LEFT invented hate speech) and that's civil suit time.

Jaamal Bowman is about to learn a very hard and likely very expensive lesson.

[A_perfect_lady]

And mere insults are not usually legally actionable.

Given the terroristic vandalism and attacks on Tesla, Elon may be able to make a case that these sorts of things are incitement to violence and endangering public safety.

[txrangerette]

Proclaiming that E. Musk is a NAZI when that has zero shred of evidence and can be widely/easily refuted, is not just an insult. There are tons and tons of evidence that he is the opposite of a Nazi and not a shred of evidence that he is. The felons attacking his businesses and threatening his life are very, very dangerous to him and our entire nation. If that is not a cause of action... ?????????!!!!!!!!! REALLY?