Posted on 03/22/2025 6:09:50 AM PDT by xxqqzz
the transportation safety board of 0:01 canada released this preliminary report 0:03 this morning on that delta plane crash 0:06 in toronto that happened um last month 0:08 the one that took off from msp was 0:10 landing in toronto and then as we all 0:12 remember you know flipped upside down 0:14 and we remember those images fortunately 0:16 everybody survived in that um today 0:19 though just a very small snippet of the 0:20 bigger report that will be released much 0:22 later um just about a two-minute video i 0:24 don't think there was any qu uh q&a or 0:26 anything so we wanted to do our own q&a 0:28 and uh who better to do it with uh with 0:30 us than this familiar face that we've 0:32 had on here on all day live uh matthew 0:34 whiz buckley former decorated navy pilot 0:36 among many other uh accolades thanks for 0:38 joining us whiz we appreciate it thanks 0:40 for having me so let's talk about uh 0:43 some of the i guess are there any big 0:44 takeaways from um from this preliminary
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I’m a former WSO/EWO. I was never a pilot. But I often flew at the controls of an F4 or F111. I could not have been the PIC because I was rated as a navigator.
PIC is not related to who has the stick - or yoke, in this case.
These are legal terms defined by the FAA. Pilot in Command doesn't mean the one manipulating the controls like you seem to think it does, it's the one who signs for the airplane and flight release. This is defined in the Federal Aviation Regulations, look it up. Pilot Flying is not the same as Pilot in Command. Between military and civilian I've been doing this for 35 years. I'm currently a Boeing 777 captain so I have to know this to do my job, trust me when I tell you that you don't know what you're talking about.
This is the reason I try not to comment on aviation threads on here, people get on the internet and do some minimal reading, don't understand what they're reading or listen to some ill prepared reporter and want to argue.
I'll bow out now. I broke my rule of not commenting on aviation & once again shouldn't have. Have a good day.
Stop flitting like Pete Buttigieg. The female pilot was in control of the jet when it crashed. She is 26 years old and a former beauty queen. She had no business being in the cockpit of that jet, let alone executing a landing. Women have slower reactions than men do, They are far more likely to panic in situations that men do not panic in. You can scream “misogyny“ all you want. You are the freaking idiot. By the way, the “ultimate responsibility“ argument you are making, and which the Canadian officials are making, is total bullshit. She somehow obtained a pilots license and a pilot should be able to land a plane. So the “pilot in command“ screwed up because he allowed a licensed pilot to land a plane? In the last three months, we have witnessed three incidents involving female pilots. The crash we are talking about in Canada. The female helicopter pilot who caused a crash in Washington DC. And just recently at LaGuardia in New York, a female pilot damn near crashed a jet in turbulent, windy weather, scraping her wing on the runway before aborting a landing.
That is true, because under 14 CFR § 135.243 Pilot in command qualifications, you did not have pilot's license with a class rating for the F4 or F111. If you did have a pilot's license and class rating, you would have been the PIC and could have logged that time as such.
She, on the other hand, was a licensed commercial pilot with an ATP certificate with the appropriate category and class rating. She was the PIC.
Stop getting your panties in a wad because she was good looking. Not every pilot is ugly as sin.
And 25 years in the military means I know some women - and some men - panic, and others do not.
I also was trained as a Safety Officer and yes, a LOT of men have crashed planes, sometimes for really stupid reasons.
Both the media and the authorities wouldn't release that she was flying the airplane until it was all over social media and they couldn't hide it anymore. If it was the male pilot, who they could blame for the crash instead of their DEI darling, he would have had his name splashed all over the headlines immediately.
“This was a harsh example of how DEI works in practice.”
A reasonable question to ask is whether the guy next to her is even PERMITTED to take over the controls...
A reasonable question to ask is whether the guy next to her is even PERMITTED to take over the controls...
To further your analogy, it’s more like you were ORDERED to let the marginally-competent employee to take the company car, even though you knew that she was not a good driver in icy conditions.
Sorry,
I thought both the pilot and co pilot would be alert and helping each other during a landing in those weather conditions.
If I was the captain I would of been paying attention during a landing in this weather and told her to go around.
I wasn’t trying to stick up for any DEI sh!t.💩
I don’t think she could be pilot in command anyway.
She hadn’t reached 1500 hrs so had a restricted license.
Captain had low hours and was a SIM instructor.
The airlines claim that by 2035 they will have overcome the pilot shortage. Yeah, good luck with that. They're just throwing numbers out there.
The only way to increase the number of pilots is to accelerate them through the pipeline.
...that and crash enough airplanes to have fewer planes (and routes) to fly.
A pilot shows up with all the right certifications and endorsements and that's it - there's no second guessing the FAA examiners and your own airline's chief pilot who approved her to pilot one of the company planes.
The older pilot wouldn't step in because this was routine weather for Toronto. Thousands of flights have safely landed there in exactly the same conditions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.