“I know this won’t make any difference to you but I post this for your consideration.”
Watched it, what’s it supposed to tell me? Only one of the volunteers was able to score all three shots within the time frame, a weapons expert. The other two they mentioned got one or two hits in the time with the rest being misses and they were determined experienced state troupers who handled weapons and had been given time to practice on the range.
Records indicate that Oswald’s marine shooting record was based on using an M1 30 cal that does not require caulking and repositioning to fire like the weapon he supposedly used to shoot Kennedy. He was considered a marksman in the marines for score but he didn’t have the MOS as one. He was a radar operator.
“I know this won’t make any difference to you...”
If you show me something that adds to another answer, it would. I’ve spent many years studying this incident like other things concerning the Kennedys, but I’m always open to any new information that applies to differences. Give me some and you might be surprised. So far you haven’t.
wy69
"And the good colonel was a lousy shot accomplishing three that a number if trained professional marksmen using the same weapon couldn’t duplicate in the time or distance involved."
The video shows people can make those shots within six seconds. It prove people with similar skills as Oswald could make the shots. With minimum practice by the participants the shots in the time frame are possible. Whatever tests Oswald took while he was a Marine doesn't discount he could get better. Oswald left the marines in 1959. He shot Kennedy in 1963. He had four years to hone his rifle skills.
The video shows the shots are possible in the time frame of six seconds and someone with Oswald's skills is capable of making those shots.