Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fury
If an autopen is not to be used, propose a Constitutional Amendment prohibiting their use.

I believe the constitution already prohibits it's use when it becomes impossible to determine if the signature was the will of the president, or the will of someone who is *NOT* the president.

It’s an interesting exercise for sure. But in the end, noting will come of it.

I am long accustomed to the "brilliant" minds of our legal system, utterly screwing things up because they can't comprehend logic, cause and effect, or simple common sense. We see it all the time. "Roe" is an example. F@g marriage is another. "Anchor babies" is a third.

76 posted on 03/15/2025 11:13:11 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
I am long accustomed to the "brilliant" minds of our legal system, utterly screwing things up because they can't comprehend logic, cause and effect, or simple common sense. We see it all the time. "Roe" is an example. F@g marriage is another. "Anchor babies" is a third.

And all of those strange ideas came from the 14th Amendment, correct?

78 posted on 03/15/2025 11:20:14 AM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson