Who brought the case and what was their standing? How did this get in front of the judge?
As ClearCase_guy insightfully posted: we, the people, were “reassured,” that not only were Biden’s actions “presumed valid,” but it would be a “violation of the sanctity of the executive branch” to investigate, because his pardons are fully within the president’s official duties.
It’s kind of funny how this seems to work.
<><>we have a Democrat president diagnosed with dementia so his tax paid unelected staff do whatever they want, with no legal authority; it’s all valid, because it’s within demented Biden’s “official duties.”
<><>there’s a Republican president, winning big in a national election, fully in possession of his faculties, carrying out the will of the voters, but a judge gets to call the shots, gets to decide what is “permissible” within Trump’s Executive Branch. And so does the Supreme Court.
Attach news clips, other relevant documents, links.
Message: We, the people, were “reassured,” that not only were Biden’s actions “presumed valid,” but it would be a “violation of the sanctity of the executive branch” to investigate, because his pardons are fully within the president’s official duties.
We demand DOJ investigate Biden’s cognitive decline
and his misguided use of the presidential pardon,
>
Who brought the case and what was their standing?
>
Doesn’t matter. It’s Anti-Trump so ‘standing’ (B.S. judicial-created-faux-legalize to get out of doing their farking JOBS) is moot.
>
How did this get in front of the judge?
>
Judicial ‘shopping’ (+ see A1, above)