Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cgbg

“That would protect the employee in case of later legal action.”

No, it would not. If they needed to know, someone above them would say so - like the President. When told they do not have access, they can complain to the President.

For an imaginary example, the SecDef doesn’t need to know the details of how a specific guidance system works. He needs to know IF they work, but not the technical details of how and why.

He might need to know we have people inside of X spying on others, but would not need to know their names or how to contact them.

“Oh, but we need to trust them!”

Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. Leon Panetta was SecDef and also head of the CIA. Political appointment.


103 posted on 03/04/2025 12:41:18 PM PST by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

That is why President Trump is going to have to step up on this issue.

We cannot have bureaucrats dictating national security policy.

That is an unacceptable disaster.


104 posted on 03/04/2025 12:43:22 PM PST by cgbg (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson