We have been the de facto muscle for the UK (not the native John Six-pint Brit, but the commercial and financial empire) for a long time. When you control enough movers and shakers in the US, it's apparently relatively easy to manipulate and - to quote Cass Sunstein - "nudge" the US into being supportive and incredibly generous.
The old clippings urging Americans to donate weapons for supporting the embattled "Home Guard" should remind us of the duplicity of the UK as well as the somewhat - shall we say - "intricate" relationships between UK power brokers and certain segments of American society. The fates of all those firearms collected is a precautionary tale about gullibility and the true record of the UK when it comes to controlling their lower-class subjects, and can also provide a nauseating glimpse of wealthy "do-gooders" and their global connections.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/01/2025 Vol.505, Q Day 2682, niteowl77 wrote: The UK's 25 tanks and less than 20,000 troops mean that NATO expected to take our guns and weapons, so they didn't need to maintain their own. We have been the de facto muscle for the UK (not the native John Six-pint Brit, but the commercial and financial empire) for a long time.
~~~ransomnote: Agreed. But the military imbalance suggests to me that it goes beyond 'being the muscle' for the UK (and other globalists). It's not just the Hillary, Obama, Bidens who want to take over America and 'acquire' her guns SOONER rather than later. Its the UK and other globalists who literally planned to have acquired America's weapons by now, and those of Russia. Look at the way the UK is arresting people for X.com posts. Without Trump we'd be in the same spot. They don't want us to say things they don't like, let alone own guns or be free of their absolute control. The UK military status means they are about 10 years behind their schedule in overthrowing freedom around the world, IMHO. ~~~
When you control enough movers and shakers in the US, it's apparently relatively easy to manipulate and - to quote Cass Sunstein - "nudge" the US into being supportive and incredibly generous.
~~~ransomnote: Agreed, but I don't believe they ever planned to 'control enough movers and shakers' for very long. That was just a transition stage - they plan to BE the owners of human 'cattle.' As our 'rulers' the globalists are unconcerned with cultural differences among nations. They don't like 'having' to control potatos like Joe Biden or Joe Average American. They want to sit in the driver's (dictator's) seat. It takes a lot of planning for a country the size of the UK to find itself in possession of 25 operational tanks while supposedly believing Russia is a threat to them (and all NATO). The globalists lives are supposed to be 'easier' once we're slaves, or so they planned and 25 operational tanks signals they expected to have already gained control of Russia/America's arsenals. According to their plans, we should be slaves by now.~~~
The old clippings urging Americans to donate weapons for supporting the embattled "Home Guard" should remind us of the duplicity of the UK as well as the somewhat - shall we say - "intricate" relationships between UK power brokers and certain segments of American society. The fates of all those firearms collected is a precautionary tale about gullibility and the true record of the UK when it comes to controlling their lower-class subjects, and can also provide a nauseating glimpse of wealthy "do-gooders" and their global connections.
~~~Agreed. Talk about duplicity - the UK pretends it's part of NATO. It reaps the benefits and has NOTHING but control to offer. It's likely true of other NATO nations - they are leeches attached to the US treasury, telling us we're bad, we're reckless, we are risking global security etc. and pretending THEY are the adults in the room. They bring NOTHING to security arrangements but expect to dictate to America.
The attitude on display among the NATO/EU/UN/WEF/ELite globalists has long been public for people like Hillary or Obama. Sometimes their facial expressions (picturing Pence here) reveal their hatred and contempt for the people to whom they are lying. Pence has a problem concealing this (Hillary is just lazy); I feel like you can read in Pence's eyes his horror as he's thinking, "I can't believe I have to waste my time trying to appeal to these animals. When 'we' take over, I'll never have to treat them like humans again!"
The UK's troop/tank deficit exposure is a political/mil version of the contempt shown us by the globalists (Soros, Pelosi etc.); it's just that their plans are farther behind schedule than I suspected.
The UK (and other EUs) posturing as if it is a powerful partner in NATO while having little to no military capacity is similar to a thug inviting you to lunch and getting on the elevator with you grinning, because he knows you're the only one with a wallet and he plans to beat you to death in the ride up to the restaurant.
~~~