This Brighthope is a liar and an idiot. Probably he doesn’t exist. The New England Journal of Medicine does exist.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Professor Ian Brighthope breaks down in tears in front of thousands in Perth as he realises that 60 million contaminated vaccines have been administered to innocent Australians now causing death and turbo cancer., brookwood wrote: This Brighthope is a liar and an idiot. Probably he doesn’t exist. The New England Journal of Medicine does exist.
You are a shill, liar and sellout; you just can't walk away from your pro-vax payout, can you? Is there some reason you cited a paper from December 30, 2020?
Are you unaware of the exposure of PFizer and Moderna trial data that easily refutes any conceivable assertions of 'safety' for the Covid 'vaccines'. PFizer wanted to conceal the trial data for 75 years. Why would they do that? Oh but a judge forced them to release their trial data and it's horrific. Loss of pregnancy alone - and yet they told pregnant ladies to get the vax. Gosh I wonder why women in their 30's in the US are experiencing a 25% increase in perimenopause? Hmmm....
This part of the December 2020 is a particularly glaring lie:
The mRNA-1273 vaccine showed 94.1% efficacy at preventing Covid-19 illness, including severe disease. Aside from transient local and systemic reactions, no safety concerns were identified.
Had you bothered to read the FDA filings as I did, you would know the 'vaccines' (gene therapy) were not tested for their ability to prevent Covid.
Oh look, more lies in your aricle:
'The emergence in December 2019 of a novel coronavirus, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has had devastating consequences globally.'
This was before the world realized that 'Covid' was nowhere near as dangerous as they lied and said it was. Oh and 'Covid' was not really a 'novel' coronavirus, and they knew it. THe 'Covid' PCR, and the 'Covid' vaccines, were not based on the 'Covid' virus; according to the CDC the 'Covid' virus was 'unavailable' so the PCR and the 'vaccines' were based on a 'related coronavirus', but had Covid been a 'novel' virus as they claimed (in order to get Emergency Use Authorization), there would be no 'related coronavirus.' All those test results we were warned about - yeah those were for a 'related coronavirus,' which if you think about it, it means that the Covid PCR had a 100% false positive rate - it wasn't testing for Covid.
Oh look, more lies in your paper:
'Control measures such as the use of masks, physical distancing, testing of exposed or symptomatic persons, contact tracing, and isolation have helped limit the transmission where they have been rigorously applied;'
The world knows now that masking and physicial distancing of 'exposed' or symptomatic persons was a useless, damaging lie as was 'contact tracing'. WHy do you like totalitarian tactics like 'contact tracing'?
Welp, I don't have time to dismantle the worthless trash you posted. You're exposed. That's why the audience gave Brighthope a round of applause - they know people like you have been lying to them from the start and he stood against all 'your kind' and told the truth.