Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger; SunkenCiv; MtnClimber

Implanting that rocket engine - after a successful “gentle and accurate landing” of the engine, its guidance package and fuel tanks on the rapidly spinning and tumbling rock! - will be very, very difficult.

Once landed, then as you point out, it needs to be securely implanted into the rock (or metal and rock or gravel or whatever is found) so the rocket thrust actual gets aimed where it needs to be pointed so the impact point is moved to a “safer” position for future orbits.

My opinion? Measure, then blast it with a big (50 to 100 Megaton) into 2 or 3 smaller blobs. Each blob will have a new trajectory. Each impact will stop higher in the atmosphere too.


24 posted on 02/20/2025 6:21:37 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (Method, motive, and opportunity: No morals, shear madness and hatred by those who cheat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A Cook PE; Red Badger

Stopping the (probably multi-axis) rotation of a rock could be done a few different ways. A small nuke would work. An impact from a different, smaller hunk of Solar System debris would work, and would be within current technical limits.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4296982/posts?page=22#22


27 posted on 02/20/2025 6:50:19 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson