Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Sivana
They were trying to shake “Kentucky Fried Chicken” down for trademark fees on “Kentucky”!

Can a state copyright its name?

29 posted on 02/18/2025 2:46:37 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Fiji Hill

It took some cross-examination, but I got this out of co-pilot ai:

“Generally, geographical names like state names cannot be trademarked by individuals or businesses in a way that allows them exclusive rights over the name. This means that no private entity can completely own a state name.

However, the situation with Kentucky was unique. The Commonwealth of Kentucky didn’t “trademark” its name in the conventional sense used for brands and logos. Instead, it enacted legislation that required businesses using “Kentucky” in their names for commercial purposes to obtain a license and pay fees. This was more of a regulatory measure than a traditional trademark.

KFC’s agreement with the state was a way to comply with this regulation without having to continually pay the fees, allowing them to continue using “Kentucky” in their brand name. So, while it might sound like a trademark, it was actually a form of state regulation.”


33 posted on 02/18/2025 2:59:26 PM PST by Dr. Sivana ("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson