Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: alexander_busek

I had forgotten to discuss the tattoos.

This is a controversial topic—but my view is that any woman with significant tattoos gets two points deducted from her SMV—so by my previous criteria she rates a solid zero.

(I am not going to go into a detailed analysis of why that is—though others can feel free to do so. It is enough to point out that she claims she is leaving her previous life behind but her tattoo is a reminder that it remains.)

The zero score means that means she has become invisible!


260 posted on 02/17/2025 5:04:43 AM PST by cgbg (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]


To: cgbg
This is a controversial topic—but my view is that any woman with significant tattoos gets two points deducted from her SMV—so by my previous criteria she rates a solid zero.

I've been a happily married man for 27 years, and so am no longer in the game of assigning points to or "rating" other women.

You are, of course, free to evaluate her SMV all you want.

Indeed, her low "rating" does make her demands all the more ridiculous.

Regards,

261 posted on 02/17/2025 5:34:46 AM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson