BTTT
Who dropped the ball while shopping this judge?
Next will a ruling to counteract a writ of mandamus forcing someone to reveal the way they improperly blocked a refusal of permission to delay an injunction against the injunctions of the lower court. A judge will block another judge’s block of a relief from an earlier injunction-—but only for 48 hours.
Megyn Kelly, who is a lawyer, explained that gettingn a TRO is virtually automatic, you just tell the judge you think something bad is being done and it needs to be stopped right now before damage is done, then a more detailed examination can be made. Only one side is required to be present and judges nearly always grant them. But they are “temporary” hence the name, and must be resolved quickly, in days or weeks. So we can expect to see fairly quick resolution, one way or the other. My bet is many if not most will be upheld and will have to be fought in an appeals court. But this explains why there have been so many TROs issued - it’s a low bar.
Why are they so concerned about others looking over what they are doing?
I’m not a lawyer so can someone explain how a union has standing to get a TRO simply because they claim irreparable harm will be done. Are they actually claiming that their employer has no right to reduce the workforce despite the employers compliance with all previously negotiated terms in their contract?
Ooooh, I want to know what kind of quid pro quo money is changing hands with unions! I forgot all about them