“You don’t get to pull that stunt again, you linked to an AI site pretending it proves your point. Pathetic and lame.”
So copying directly from the High School Journal’s own “About” page is a “stunt”. Imagine that:
https://jhss.scholasticahq.com/about
“Now again I ask how does that link and statement support your lie that the study is only AI peer reviewed?”
Well there’s no “only” in my post. You added that. But you couldn’t keep calling me a liar without pretending that I did so I see your dilemma. It’s hard to be honest and a kook.
And you did it again, you clearly stated AI was used as the peer review when the article clearly states AI is used for prescreening, you left out they use 2 blind independent HUMAN reviewers.
Yes you lied with the intent to deceive in order to support your narrative of dismissing the thread.
You lied, period, all stop no amount of trying to change the subject, reframe the argument or ignoring parts of posts calling you put will change that.
You lied and your last multiple posts have been nothing but you trying to squirm your way out of that fact.