True, but he (and we) have since discovered what a large percentage of his hires were simply Deep State devotees. He CLEARLY is not making that mistake again. Just because it was authorized during Trump I, does not mean that Trump II cannot oppose and fix it. In fact, it gives even more reason and proper moral authority to fix the mistakes of the past that were done during Trump I.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Trump Demands ‘Radical Left’ Reuters Return $9 Million to US Gov — That He Gave Them — After Baseless Elon Musk Claim, Teacher317 wrote: a contract awarded during his own administration True, but he (and we) have since discovered what a large percentage of his hires were simply Deep State devotees. He CLEARLY is not making that mistake again. Just because it was authorized during Trump I, does not mean that Trump II cannot oppose and fix it. In fact, it gives even more reason and proper moral authority to fix the mistakes of the past that were done during Trump I.
They don't want us to remember they were lawfaring him within an inch of treason charges. We see how they resist his supervision when he isn't under attack 'Seven ways to Sunday' (Schumerism), he could not have prevailed with Congress and the DOJ against him during his first term.