Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: monkeyshine
“As far as the “unwritten checks and balances” and “customs” go, that was never really a thing either.”

I'm not sure what Soros was talking about with his “unwritten checks and balances” statement.

To my knowledge the term “checks and balances” does not appear in the U.S. Constitution, but the principles are certainly there.

The President can veto a law. The Congress can override a veto. The Supreme Court can strike down a law.

Both judges and presidents can be impeached and removed by Congress.

The president appoints judges and Congress approves the appointments. And so forth and so on - checks and balances.

65 posted on 02/12/2025 7:22:52 AM PST by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: jeffersondem

Yes. You are correct. It has nothing to do with the POTUS consulting on policy directives given to an agency or department, or their day to day operations. People and politicians are free to talk poorly about decisions, that’s America and I like it (prefer it when the speakers are normal brained people) but no, there is no C&B or historic customs requiring consulting with Congress or anyone else on agency level day to day procedures policies. Except maybe the kleptocracy keeps an eye out for one another and asks around who of their fellow travelers will get hurt by such and such decision. Sort of like what Elon Musk said the other day in the Oval Officd behind Trump. “Everything is geared around complain minimization. If everyone gets money nobody complains and everyone wins”.


66 posted on 02/12/2025 8:17:21 AM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson