To: Libloather
Did you notice the “potential crash sites”? They include the eastern Pacific Ocean, northern South America, the Atlantic Ocean, Africa, the Arabian Sea, and South Asia.
9 posted on
02/02/2025 4:45:26 PM PST by
Blurb2350
(posted from my 1500-watt blow dryer)
To: Blurb2350
That narrows it down, doesn’t it?
17 posted on
02/02/2025 4:53:30 PM PST by
july4thfreedomfoundation
(Russia? China? Democrats and RINOs are the biggest threat to the survival of America.)
To: Blurb2350
So the Western Pacific is safe?
moving at a speed that would meet Earth by December 22
Odd phrasing. Usually the exact date of nearest approach is known. With a 1.6% chance of impact, that gives cross section area of 61 times Earth's cross section, or a location uncertainty of a circle about 32,000 miles.
19 posted on
02/02/2025 4:56:15 PM PST by
KarlInOhio
(“Forget it, Jake. It's California.”)
To: Blurb2350
Can I vote for the Arabian Sea?
23 posted on
02/02/2025 5:03:22 PM PST by
Jim Noble
(Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
To: Blurb2350
I tried to tell everybody that sea level rise was a real threat (OK, so I left out that tiny little detail about a meteor).
To: Blurb2350
Well, if they’ve determined potential crash sites, with a 1.6% chance of impact, than they must have a ballpark idea of how close it’s actually going to get….
31 posted on
02/02/2025 5:27:14 PM PST by
telescope115
(I NEED MY SPACE!!! 🔭)
To: Blurb2350; All
So basically, somewhere on Earth
38 posted on
02/02/2025 5:52:56 PM PST by
Mr. K
(no consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson