Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeMind

In another article about microplastics, I was surprised at the upper end of the size-range of what is considered ‘microplastics’ (2mm, if I remember correctly). The article focused on the alarming amount of microplastics in the oceans - I’m thinking in order to dramatize the amount, they may have seen fit to be more inclusive by expanding the size-range.

I would be curious to know the size-range of the plastic particles found in these placentas - since knowing that would help narrow down the likely source, i.e., confirm that it was from household dust arising from synthetic clothing and bedsheets, rug fibers, etc..- and suggest what filters might mitigate the problem.


24 posted on 02/02/2025 10:23:24 AM PST by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: enumerated

They are found in every placenta (possibly bloodstream) but the biggest difference with normal weight and preterm were PET, PVC, polyurethane, and polycarbonate.


34 posted on 02/02/2025 11:28:01 AM PST by erlayman (E )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson