To: marcusmaximus
Moscow said the move was designed to weaken Russian and Chinese nuclear deterrence. Yeah, that would be the plan. Deterrance from what exactly? Unless I'm mistaken, under the ABM Treaty, Moscow was allowed to keep their nuclear armed missile defense system in place.
2 posted on
02/01/2025 8:17:21 AM PST by
Carry_Okie
(The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
To: All
To: marcusmaximus
Russia is always complaining about defensive weapons
8 posted on
02/01/2025 8:21:49 AM PST by
AppyPappy
(If Hitler were alive today and criticized Trump, would he still be Hitler?)
To: marcusmaximus
F Russia.
Are our defensive missiles now “encircling” then too?
9 posted on
02/01/2025 8:22:55 AM PST by
Williams
(Thank God for the election of President Trump!)
To: marcusmaximus
This is vastly more feasible now than it has ever been. Its about time someone got serious about it.
11 posted on
02/01/2025 8:30:22 AM PST by
buwaya
(Strategic imperatives )
To: marcusmaximus
Wait a minute the Russians claim that their missals can’t be stopped by any defense system, so what are they worried about.
14 posted on
02/01/2025 10:07:43 AM PST by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again," )
To: marcusmaximus
How well does the Iron Dome work on weather balloons?
15 posted on
02/01/2025 10:52:05 AM PST by
Libloather
(Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
