“JOS touted something like that - he claimed Q went to telegram (or some such service) where a countdown clock “
```````
Um, no, JOS did not ‘tout’ that. However I do recall JOS discussing something that McAfee set up regarding a crypto-coin purchase level.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 02/01/2025 Vol.504, Q Day 2654, smileyface wrote: “JOS touted something like that - he claimed Q went to telegram (or some such service) where a countdown clock “
```````
Um, no, JOS did not ‘tout’ that. However I do recall JOS discussing something that McAfee set up regarding a crypto-coin purchase level.One person's 'tout' is another person's 'discuss'.
I posted on a thread notes from a JOS interview in which JOS said Q had to go further under ground when Trump left office so they took over McAfee's account, and I think it was McAffee's Telegram.
Since JOS said Q took over the McAffee account, and went on to say that that when the crypto-coin purchase level reached a certain amount, there would be a massive data release (D5 or declas style).
Since JOS lied and said Q took over the account which was hosting that cryptocurrency countdown, JOS lent his name/reputation to the cryptocurrency countdown. He back tracked on the validity of the countdown (didn't want his fingreprints on that) while lending his own reputation to convince people Q was in control of that account. The one in control of that account controls the clock.
He can't have it both ways - claim he knows that it's Q in control of the account, specify what the countdown means/funding levels, and then (paraphrasing) 'Heh heh I don't know if this is a sure thing' type cya. The alternative understanding would be Q took control of McAffee's account as JOS said, but that Q doesn't know what that is or how to control it (i.e., Q was fine with it). Why would Q be 'fine' with a massive data breach (said to be downloads from Fed Servers) set up by McAffee? What a mess of a story JOS concocted!
Why on earth would JOS link Q to Telegram as if it was a fact, claiming they went there to go 'further underground'? That's absurd. By claiming Q took it over, JOS gave that McAffee account credibility it didn't deserve. He spent enough time on it in that interview to make me wonder if he was to receive a cut. He didn't say 'buy coin!' he said 'Q took over that account.' He offered backside covering caveats while propping up the credibility of the account holder, Q. Were we supposed to assume Q was running a crypto scam or just didn't care about massive gov data breaches? How many people would buy crypto if they believed Q was in charge of the account versus how many would do so if they thought it was an anonymous person or a dead (MCaffee) person in control?
This concludes what I called JOS 'touting' a situation which I said was 'similar,' but was in fact far worse than Code Monkey's announcement clock (Code didn't promise D5 for a certain funding level).