the Nazi tats were not great, but I think the extreme alcoholism and lack of any managerial or leadership experience were also important.
Troll
There were no Nazi tats and claims of alcoholism are just the usual pack of Democrat lies along with financial mismanagement of the veterans group he led. Congrats on being gullible enough to swallow the lies hook line and sinker though.
I guess you also consider Indians “Nazis” because Hindus use the swatztika.
Or, maybe, just maybe, you’re not so stupid and understand that different groups (such as Christians in Pete’s case) use symbols in 100% different ways.
Nah, you’re too stupid and trolling.
“tats”
It is a Crusader-style Jerusalem cross I believe.
Definite troll.
Forget the sarcasm tag?
“lack of any managerial or leadership experience were also important”
I suspect that at the Secretary of Defense level most everything is done by consensus after lots of meetings.
His 2017 sex escapade was a big problem; but his qualifications and his subsequent huge change of attitude led many of us to want to give him a second chance.
Which Nazi Tats are you referring to? The Catholic Cross?
Dafuq you on about?
Deus Vult is Latin, not German.
"Deus vult (Latin for 'God wills it') is a Christian motto historically tied to ideas of Divine providence and individual interpretation of God's will."
The phrase has been used from the original Crusades in the 1000's, to modern Christians. That it happened to be used by Nazi's and extremists is not associative.
You might as well say that, since the Nazi's used punctuation, that everyone who uses punctuation is a Nazi.
Do better.
Re: 4 - the tats are not material in the end. Claims of alcoholism in that position are always a concern.
He had his hearing (hearings were largely useless), the vote was taken. He has his chance to lead the DOD and will be measured on that.