To: grey_whiskers
I’ll never understand how lab equipment can monitor something as small as an individual atom. Especially taking Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle into account (changing it by observing it).
4 posted on
01/16/2025 6:46:28 PM PST by
Ciaphas Cain
(A perfect storm. There will be no escape from what is coming.)
To: Ciaphas Cain
I’ll never understand how lab equipment can monitor something as small as an individual atom. Especially taking Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle into account (changing it by observing it).
Theoretically, quantum computing works because of the uncertainty principle, not in spite of it. The qubit, which is usually an electron (much smaller than an atom!), maintains a superposition state of 0 and 1 at the same time, unlike a conventional computer bit, which must be 0 or 1.
Lab equipment doesn't monitor the qubit when it's in the middle of quantum computing processing. Lab equipment measures the results of processing. Because as you and Heisenberg know, once you observe or measure the qubit, its superposition will collapse and become a known state - just like a regular computer bit (0 or 1).
To: Ciaphas Cain
12 posted on
01/16/2025 7:50:18 PM PST by
sasquatch
(Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit! c/o piytar)
To: Ciaphas Cain
"(changing it by observing it)" Physicists have a different definition of "observing" than you or I do. If you observe a jet flying overhead, you don't change it by looking at it, and it doesn't behave any differently if 1, or 100,000, or zero people observe it. It is changed, though, by being observable.
To "observe" something as tiny as an atom, means that you must measure its properties. It's the measurement process that alters it. That's what "observing" means.
26 posted on
01/17/2025 5:33:12 AM PST by
norwaypinesavage
(Freud: projection is a defense mechanism of those struggling with inferiority complexes)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson