BTTT
“whether the firm has something to hide”
NY?
That’s a given.
too bad for him. looks like he missed at least half of his 81 million 2020 fake votes this time. no mas you stinker elias.
At the same time go after ALL leftist foundations; Carnegie, Heinz, MacArthur etc. Destroy ALL of them and also investigate and lawfare to death as many leftist NGOs and "think tanks" as time and resources permit.
Afterwards, salt the earth to the point that any leftist scumbag looking to replace traditional Western/Judeo-Chrisitan values with leftist-commie crap will think thrice before trying to push sick, anti-human,racist. destructive, criminal, perverse garbage into the fabric of our societies.
Precisely. I despise and loathe him.
Marc Elias, Reid Hoffman, Merrick Garland…..
Without additional “consideration” the new terms and requirements may be unenforceable in contract law. Being allowed to continue in your same job does not equal consideration.
They don’t come any dirtier than this guy, Elias.
I can well imagine that his employees could have a wealth of incriminating information on him that he would like to keep hidden in arbitration rather than see the light of day in litigation.
I suspect as a lay person that arbitration doesn’t apply to protected class law.
There’s always the possibility of a leak of damaging information.
This seems to me the perfect way to guarantee that you have only mediocre employees.
“The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of choosing Senators.”
Article I, SECTION 4
“Not until 1842, when it passed a law requiring the election of Representatives by districts, did Congress undertake to exercise this power. In subsequent years, Congress expanded on the requirements, successively adding contiguity, compactness, and substantial equality of population to the districting requirements. However, no challenge to the seating of Members-elect selected in violation of these requirements was ever successful,3 and Congress deleted the standards from the 1929 Apportionment Act.”
“Under the Enforcement Act of 1870, and subsequent laws, false registration, bribery, voting without legal right, making false returns of votes cast, interference in any manner with officers of election, and the neglect by any such officer of any duty required of him by state or federal law were made federal offenses. Provision was made for the appointment by federal judges of persons to attend at places of registration and at elections with authority to challenge any person proposing to register or vote unlawfully, to witness the counting of votes, and to identify by their signatures the registration of voters and election tally sheets. When the Democratic Party regained control of Congress, these pieces of Reconstruction legislation dealing specifically with elections were repealed.”
Congress...may, in short, use its power under this clause, combined with the Necessary and Proper Clause, to regulate the times, places, and manner of electing Members of Congress so as to fully safeguard the integrity of the process; it may not, however, under this clause, provide different qualifications for electors than those provided by the states.”
“’The Framers understood the Elections Clause as a grant of authority to issue procedural regulations, and not as a source of power to dictate electoral outcomes, to favor or disfavor a class of candidates, or to evade important constitutional restraints.’”
case citations and more at:
https://constitution.findlaw.com/article1/annotation18.html