”Despite the lack of criminal charges, the jury did unearth numerous major findings in its report that shine a light on deceptive behavior and actions surrounding the development and promotion of the Covid shots.
Here are some of the biggest takeaways from the analysis. “
1. Premature Emergency Approval
"While understanding the seriousness Covid posed to vulnerable populations (such as the elderly) and the desire to quickly develop medical interventions to save lives,
the grand jury disagreed with the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) assessment that the Covid “emergency” “applied to everyone.”
Based upon its assessment of the flagship trial data available at the time, the jury opined that the “Emergency Use Authorization” (EUA)
granted to the Pfizer and Moderna Covid shots “should only have been granted as to the elderly and comorbid populations most at risk from SARS-Co V-2 complications.” (continues)
2. Disservice to Pregnant Women
The jury found an alarming lack of care given to conducting secure flagship trials and research on the Covid shots’ impact on pregnant women.
Specifically, the jurors disclosed their belief that expectant mothers were not “well-served by the United States public health apparatus”
and that such “troubling issues” were not “properly and meaningfully disclosed and discussed over the last four years.” ..(Continues)
3. Failure to Complete Safety Studies
As noted by the jury, the FDA provided “Full Approval” letters to Pfizer and Moderna,
granting complete market access for their respective Covid shots.
In order to keep their licenses, both companies were required to conduct a series of “interventional and observational” studies
monitoring the “safety and effectiveness” of the jabs after they were released to market. “
”Despite having received these mandates years ago (Pfizer in August 2021 and Moderna in January 2022), the grand jury found that both companies have failed to complete several of the required studies by deadline and received timeline extensions from federal administrators. “ ...(continues)
4. Lack of Info on Safety Signals
”As described in the report, pharmaceutical companies and public health agencies possess postmarketing surveillance databases that collect reports of potential side effects experienced by those who receive their approved vaccines.
According to the analysis, after a “safety signal” is “identified,” the former entities will conduct research using available data
and research to determine the validity of the safety signal.
If such signals are valid, the companies share their data with the FDA to determine whether it is “confirmed” or “refuted.” ...(continues)
“We emphatically disagree,” the jury wrote. “In fact, we believe it perfectly illustrates the larger paternalistic attitude
on the part of both government health agencies and the pharmaceutical industry towards the public. …
>Hiding the details, methodology and results of scores of safety investigations from public view does not build public confidence; it undermines it.” (Emphasis theirs)
5. Myocarditis Cover-Up
”While maintaining that Vaccine-Related Myocarditis and Pericarditis (VRMP) events are “very rare,” the grand jury disclosed significant findings about such incidents,
including the apparent withholding of such information from the American public. “ ...(Continues at great length)
6. Government Censorship
”The grand jury devoted attention to the mass censorship deployed by the federal government and Big Tech against Americans who disagreed with its preferred narrative on Covid.
While characterizing the scheme as a “concerted effort … to seek the suppression of opinions not in line with messages they wanted to amplify,” the judicial body noted
how these government figures “exercised considerable soft power … by attempting to control vaccine-related narratives on social media websites, asking for specific posts or authors to be removed altogether,
or even ‘blacklisted’ … on the grounds that they contained ‘misinformation’ or ‘disinformation.’ “ (Emphasis theirs)
7. Deceptive Advertising
”Moderna and Pfizer also deployed deceptive “unbranded” advertising tactics when marketing their products to the public, according to the report.” ... (continues)
8. Risks vs. Benefits
”While the grand jury acknowledged that the Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer and Moderna shots was reasonable at the time given the early data from the flagship trials and other “limited information” available, it subsequently noted that “circumstances have changed” in the years since that call into question their necessity. Specifically, the panel detailed how the virus “infects and causes COVID-19 disease at a much lower rate than it used to” and produces “fewer hospitalizations and deaths.”... (Continues)
Grand Jury Recommendations (Continues)
Ping to post 28.
We *anti-vaxxers*, are vindicated.
I don’t know how any one of these findings isn’t criminal.