Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux

‘ See. Illogical troll.’

I know you are but what am I?

What is that? You don’t address the comment, ,merely try to insult, and I’m the troll?

🤣


55 posted on 01/08/2025 4:11:30 PM PST by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Fuzz; daniel1212
Quit yur crying troll. Here's a comment just for you.

You may not know it, but we love you. We worry about you. It's an eternally dark and painful place you are destined for unless you change.

Here tis:

When examining the possibility of God’s existence, particularly one outside of physical reality, scientific evidence is insufficient due to its focus on observable, material phenomena.

Instead, the investigation must rely on other forms of evidence that address questions beyond the scope of empirical science:

Philosophical evidence, such as arguments from causality, design, morality, and existence itself, provides a logical framework for exploring the possibility of a transcendent being.

Historical evidence, including religious texts, documented miracles, and events like the resurrection of Jesus, offers insights grounded in human history.

Experiential evidence, such as mystical encounters, answered prayers, and profound personal transformations, provides subjective but meaningful data about divine interaction.

Practical evidence, including the societal and personal effects of faith, as well as metaphysical reasoning like contingency, can further inform the inquiry.

Additionally, cultural and collective intuitions, such as the universality of religion and shared moral sensibilities, offer a broader context for exploration.

These types of evidence—philosophical, historical, experiential, practical, and cultural—create a comprehensive foundation for examining the possibility of God’s existence, transcending the limits of empirical observation. Logic is still relied on but it has to be applied to the kind of “evidence” available.

But at the bottom of it all, Christ isn't about evidence. He is about his love for you. YOU.

I don't care if you kick at me and all of us. Kick away. But he loves you more than you can possibly know.

And we do too.

We are your brothers and sisters even if you hate us. Your hate doesn't erase our love for you.

As Jesus/Yeshua said, the last will be first. That means you. As a more recent believer, you will be somehow dearer to him. You will be first and we will be behind you...following him...and you.

Hate us if you will, but we love you. And he loves us all more than you and I can imagine.

I am not asking you to accept him as your Lord and savior.

I am just asking you to consider it. Just consider Him.

What have you got to lose.

58 posted on 01/08/2025 4:35:44 PM PST by RoosterRedux (Emerson paraphrased, "If you strike at the king, don't fail." The Democrats failed. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson