Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger
One notes the prose in the article plays the "assumptive close" trick by skipping an intermediate step.

One reads, "...this mechanism shares some similarities with sex-determination systems found in humans and other animals." Sex determination in humans? Nope. None identified and none detailed. This is an assertion slipped into the prose, expecting few to notice.

Additionally one reads later, "...this is similar to the way animal sex chromosomes work, with two structural variants (X and Y chromosomes in humans and other mammals) kept roughly in balance." Nope. "Similar" is neither explicated nor proven. The article's report of some academic work is become "political" for the sake -- most likely -- of supporting transsexual ideology. Which looks like this:

None of the transsexuals are getting their DNA altered in any way. Period.

40 posted on 01/06/2025 6:56:52 AM PST by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Worldtraveler once upon a time

+1

This bears repeating:

> None of the transsexuals are getting their DNA altered
> in any way. Period.


66 posted on 01/06/2025 10:51:16 AM PST by mbj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson