[MoneyBack]

But even then, if the guy posts relevant information, it’s okay to take the information without shooting the messenger.

Cardinal mistake! Extremely foolish and naive! Inconsistent nonsense of the highest order!


I do not discuss the Clickbait of someone who is obviously a criminal disinformation agent who has zero credibility. Fore example, Armstrong has posted info gleaned from the satire magazine THE ONION as fact! He also falsely claimed that his Socrates program was running on the IBM Sequoia, once the World's Fastest Supercomputer installation owned by the US government.

Specifically,

All confidence tricksters rely on periodically divulging information that, only for the purpose of establishing trust, appears to align with reality.

Now given all that, how would you manage the "information" flow ow a professional trickster like Armstrong while he is hiding his identity?

Only the blind suckers ignore this minefield and support a criminal by rewarding him when they discuss his clickbait because he tells them what they want to hear.

[cgbg]

The trick is to tell the bad news about Armstrong.

Once.

One post.

Then move on....

[Lazamataz]

"But even then, if the guy posts relevant information, it’s okay to take the information without shooting the messenger."

Cardinal mistake! Extremely foolish and naive! Inconsistent nonsense of the highest order!

Dude, you must think everyone besides you is a moron. I have the capacity to receive relevant/good information and still not get swept away into a scam.