Actually, libertarians and paleocons have also long used the term "imperialist."
But ... so what? As Rush used to say, words have meaning. If a big country pressures a small country to "sell" their land, that's imperialism.
And Denmark has made it clear that it does not want to sell Greenland.
So unless you're an imperialist, that should be the end of the matter.
Neither libertarian nor “paleocon” (a misnomer) are conservative. Leave the argument from authority (a logical fallacy) out of this.
Not to mention Trump has thus far been more libertarian in practice than libertarians fancy themselves to be, although he is more socially conservative in many areas.
The opinion of Denmark’s current prime minister (who is a social democrat) has no bearing on what the people might want. Not to mention the fact that the head of state of Denmark is King Frederick X, who might be amenable to selling Greenland if Trump presents attractive terms. Of course, the European Union, a highly imperialistic entity in and of itself, would have its own opinion and since they generally are Trump haters, they would oppose such a purchase. (Are you still trying to equate purchase with invasion, seriously? by altering the meaning of “pressure”? lol)
You’re up too late. You have a nice evening.