Replies

ransomnote's long post about the Livelsberger 'narrative'. To skip it, scroll down to gif of cat climbing wall.

The linked hard-left article (below) suggests that the media is downplaying the Trump Hotel/Cybertruck blast. WHy would controlled media 'downplay' information which they could use to further tar MAGA, Military, Trump supporters etc.?
I think the article is trying to focus attention on the psyop purpose of the explosion, as if the lefty writer/organization feels the message is being withheld. I wonder if this is meant to put a veneer of credibility on this effort? Didn't want the left to look too eager to rush to pin the psyop 'message' on a patriot, military, Trump supporter?
Because of Livelsberger's signal change, and his history, I don't believe he plotted the explosion or wrote what have been referred to as two 'manifestos'. Both are written in the style of Antifa/DEM 'activists'; nothing about the 'story' sounds like military special ops thinking/acting.
Why Are Publications Sugar-Coating Livelsberger’s Political Minifestos?
By Josh Marshall
|
January 4, 2025
Most headlines I’d seen in the news report only that he warned of national decline and bore “no ill will toward Mr. Trump,” in the words of one of the investigators. That gloss on Donald Trump is, shall we say, a bit of an understatement, as you can see in these excerpts.
Military and vets move on DC starting now. Militias facilitate and augment this activity.
Occupy every major road along fed buildings and the campus of fed buildings by the hundreds of thousands.
Lock the highways around down with semis right after everybody gets in. Hold until the purge is complete.
Try peaceful means first, but be prepared to fight to get the Dems out of the fed government and military by any means necessary. They all must go and a hard reset must occur for our country to avoid collapse.
'note: The black and white thinking which dictates all persons of 'the wrong' political affiliation are evil is textbook Lefty/Antifa and I believe the result of CIA social conditioning. A fair number of Republicans know well the betrayals of our supposed conservative 'representatives' and Congress critters. Livelsberger would have been aware of the betrayals of NoName and Robert Mueller etc.
I've read lefties portraying all Republicans as bad, but I've not read any Republicans urging the removal of Dems as if that would solve all problems. Really? Leaving in place all Republican sellouts?
I beiieve the two attacks, both suspects portrayed as military, are meant to make the public distrust the actions of the military in advance of some anticipated public event with the military at its core.
This reminds me that most patriots, and likely all Black Hats, don't know what Q's 'quickly shut down' plan is for the late-game powerstruggle likely to break into the open, possibly in the Capitol, will look like. But, the Deep State does have plans of some kind to counter, and the controlled media are part of their plan. I wonder if the excerpt of the 'manifestos' above gives us an idea what the Deep State fears or plans to portray should the white hat/black hat break into the open.
I think the two incidents said to involve military men are also meant to justify the interpretation of any action the Biden regime might take to 'protect' democracy (martial law at the Capitol?) against military, republicans, citizens groups (deemed militias), and possibly select groups of truck drivers (reference to semi's).
If the excerpt is any indication, then the Deep State fears overwhelming numbers of current and retired military to swarm the Capitol, roadways blocked with semis, as mass arrests are made. If so, then the MSM would portray those events as if the manifesto excerpt were predictive; the MSM would only report Democrat arrests; they would perhaps portray the military as 'out-of-control' under the direction of a vengeful Trump, and any citizens who try to assist as insurrectionist militias.
I don't see this tactic succeeding. I am amazed that Trump/Q/Mil have diffused all the havoc that the Deep State intended to break out when Trump won. That's Trump's style - diffusing the mayhem the Deep State finds so useful. From Trump's win in Nov, I recall Flynn talking about a long litany of violence/unrest that would continue until Jan 20 if not beyond. In 2024, the mil/Q/Trump handled what must have been nonstop instigation on the part of the Deep State. I think it likely that disaster(s) was averted on New Years Eve. The Deep State did not wait since the election to only blow up a cybertruck and attack civilians in NO. They had to have so much more planned, and then diffused by mil etc.
With this on my mind, I saw bitt's post:
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 01/01/2025 Vol.503, Q Day 2623, bitt wrote:
EXCERPTED:
🚨 Trump Announces MASSIVE RALLY In Washington DC Ahead Of Inauguration | ‘This Will Be BIBLICAL’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EO0i-L3zVA 10 min
(I like Benny!)

Hmmmm....was the Deep State trying to prevent this kind of Trump rally with their 'narratives' about terrorist attacks, including Livelsberger's supposed remarks? What kind of information might be released at such a rally in the Capitol; what might they see or witness?
Regardless, Black Hat's must read every Trump post with fearful, rolling eyes; won't a rally mean traffic congestion, military presence, citizens flooding the zone....it 'it' about to happen?
Trump/Q/American Warriors have been blessed by God to help them as they held back so much evil from the public. Maybe the Black Hat fears will not happen, and instead the continued take-down-in-the-background will prevail.
This 'manifesto ' psyop has a 'divisive' feature - any conflict wherin the left believes Conservatives are destroying freedom (e.g., arrests at Capitol) would certainly harden the MSM left's current aversion to conservatives everywhere else in the country (YOU elected Trump and now look! Anarchy!). On DU, I've seen many posts about how people will no longer speak to family members because if they voted for Trump, they have to be evil.
In closing, the article tries to shore up one of the stupidest assertions of the cybertruck explosion 'narrative'.
He’s pretty clear: making something go boom around big Trump and Musk identifiers would get everyone’s attention. As indeed it did.
Such actions don't harmonize with anything else about the man, personally or professionally, and he would know behaving like a terrorist would not give the issue(s) he is said to want to publicize any sort of legitimacy. There's something about the explosion/narrative which seems like an implausible movie plot coming out of Hollyweird.