Kash Patel 🇺🇸 News @KashPatel_News
Let’s not forget a pardon doesn’t not cover treason.
Looks like they didn’t rule on the unknown crimes part:
It is hence contended by Burdick that the pardon is illegal for the absence of specification, not reciting the offenses upon which it is intended to operate — worthless therefore as immunity. To support the contention, cases are cited. It is asserted besides that the pardon is void as being outside of the power of the President under the Constitution of the United States because it was issued before accusation or conviction or admission of an offense. This, it is insisted, is precluded by the constitutional provision which gives power only “to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States,” and it is argued, in effect, that not in the imagination or purpose of executive magistracy can an “offense against the United States” be established, but only by the confession of the offending individual or the judgment of the judicial tribunals. We do not dwell further on the attack. We prefer to place the case on the ground we have stated.
Kash Patel 🇺🇸 News @KashPatel_News
Let’s not forget a pardon doesn’t not cover treason.
Plus even if any of this were legal it all originates
from the treason /insurrection of a stolen election
by bye biden.
