To: RitaOK
And, Cannon fires on Jack Smith, AGAIN!🔥
I don't understand how the issue with the report got as far as it did. Judge Cannon already ruled that because Smith was never authorized by Congress as required by the Constitution, he was never a special prosecutor. If that is the case, then how can anything he produced be officially accepted? Strange!
4,696 posted on
01/21/2025 11:43:09 AM PST by
tang-soo
(Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
To: tang-soo
Spot On. Let us presume that your accurate observation serves as another NAIL in the Old Guard coffin, marked as the Comey, Barr, Wray and AG Garland/Biden Justice Department.
JD did not object to Canon’s ruling all the way to the US SUPREME COURT, either.
Wonder why? 😁
🕛
4,710 posted on
01/21/2025 12:10:12 PM PST by
RitaOK
(Viva Christo Rey. For Greater Glory. )
To: tang-soo
Her ruling was only for the issue before her.
1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment Based on Unlawful Appointment and Funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith is GRANTED in accordance with this Order[ECF No. 326].
2. The Superseding Indictment [ECF No. 85] is DISMISSED.
3. This Order is confined to this proceeding. The Court decides no other legal rights or claims.
4. This Order shall not affect or weaken any of the protections for classified information imposed in this case or any protective orders pertaining to classified information.
5. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. Any scheduled hearings are CANCELLED. Any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, and any pending deadlines are TERMINATED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this 15th day of July
2024._________________________________ AILEEN M. CANNON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5,510 posted on
01/24/2025 12:42:58 AM PST by
stylin19a
(1 year i saw that 4,153,237 people got wed. not to stir up trouble but that should be an even number)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson