The error is not mine. I paraphrased the article.
I can have a business that refuses cash in Colorado, as long as I have a device that accepts pre-paid cards. The device does not have to be part of my business but a separate operation, just on site.
But go ahead and argue semantics, Mr. Aspergers.
AND WRONG
“I can have a business that refuses cash in Colorado, as long as I have a device that accepts pre-paid cards.”
That is not what you said earlier.
“But go ahead and argue semantics, Mr. Aspergers.”
Words have meaning. Devices have names. Laws have words. Laws name devices.
“as long as I have a device that accepts pre-paid cards.”
Can you quote the law on that? Nope.