Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GingisK
Only intensely ignorant people believe that.

I used to believe like you. Until I read the evidence, whistleblowers, and the deep fake engines that prove the “moon” landings are studio fabricated “moon” landings. In fact, the last time we sent astronauts 350 miles up in the shuttle they incurred radiation damage. Somehow we have not been able to go past 350 miles since 1972 when we went 238,000 miles and back.? No refueling? No navigation computers? LOL! 😂
33 posted on 12/26/2024 9:04:25 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Jan_Sobieski

I love the on board capsule computer mythology—classic Potemkin village stuff:

https://www.aulis.com/pascal.htm


34 posted on 12/26/2024 9:07:38 AM PST by cgbg (It is time to pull the Deep State out of the mass media--like ticks from a dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski
In fact, the last time we sent astronauts 350 miles up in the shuttle they incurred radiation damage. Radiation damage is proportional to the radiation intensity times the time spent in the radiation. The lower Van Allen belts are pretty intense ... where that shuttle went. Apollo went out of earth orbit closer to the center of the Van Allen toroid, thus avoiding the intense inner belt. It passed quickly through the much weaker fringes of the outer belt.

No refueling. On a free ballistic coast none would be necessary since engines are used only for landing or takeoff; and those were all different engines with their own fuel tanks. No refueling is used in the case of bullets either. This point alone clearly indicates that you really don't have any background in ordinary physics, just like the "Internet Gurus" you prefer to believe.

No navigation computers The Apollo ship did indeed have a navigation computer. It was a 15-bit, 36K byte digital computer that was designed by MIT and built by Raytheon. There was also a built-in sextant that took sightings from the sun, earth, and moon. The Apollo ship was data-linked to ground stations, giving access to the big computers at the various space centers.

The problem with the Internet is that people believe what they see there without the ability to utilize other sources or knowledge of provable facts, let along reason things out for themselves.

I know that I will be unable to convince you otherwise because you wish to believe the Apollo landings did not occur. I assume you weren't alive at that time, I was twenty years old and witnessed a lot first hand. If you do actual research, you find that those landings did occur.

From your viewpoint, how do you explain the presence of the laser reflectors on the moon, the TV camera from Surveyor 7 back here on the earth, and the photos of the landing sites made by Japanese and Chinese overflights?

40 posted on 12/26/2024 10:17:51 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson