Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeMind

This approach sounds solid.

My PSA began increasing about 10 years ago above the acceptable levels. Digital exam indicated no detectable masses. Two biopsies ensued in the next two years which found ZERO cancer. My urologist finally ordered an MRI guided biopsy based on suspect areas of the prostate. They finally found a small sample of Gleason 3+3 tissue, which I decided to “treat” with active surveillance.

My PSA continued to increase so we ultimately decided on radical prostatectomy. PSA has been undetectable since.

In my opinion, repeated biopsies can results in gland inflammation as well as risk bacterial infections, since they go through the rectal wall to get the tissue samples. These outcomes can aggravate PSA, resulting in a spiral into false readings.


11 posted on 12/22/2024 11:38:27 AM PST by fwdude (Why is there a "far/radical right," but damned if they'll admit that there is a far/radical left?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fwdude

“In my opinion, repeated biopsies can results in gland inflammation as well as risk bacterial infections”

I ended up in the emergency room after a prostrate biopsy a few years ago. I spent the entire day getting antibiotics through every orifice in my body. I will be going through another prostrate biopsy tomorrow at 8:30 based on the results of an MRI. Getting old sucks.


12 posted on 12/22/2024 11:45:43 AM PST by suthener ( I do not like living under our homosexual, ghetto, feminist government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson