I’ve seen this posted on X a number of times and also read what Berenson says.
It’s both interesting and important.
Has anyone seen a preprint or an abstract?
“Has anyone seen a preprint or an abstract”
I could lend out my blood tests to show that I still have that crap in my body. Blood tests every three months for two years, every 6 months after that now I’ll go once a year just to see what else in my body it keeps damaging. Coming up on four years this spring.
Evidently the journal these guys approached turned down their paper, so there is nothing other than Berenson referring to a conference call in his substack piece. He says they plan on using an unreviewed server:
“The researchers have reported finding spike protein on conference calls with participants in their study in October and again this week. Two people independently told Unreported Truths of the study’s findings.
They researchers discussed publishing the findings with at least one major peer-reviewed journal, a person with direct knowledge of those discussions said. The journal declined.
The scientists now plan to publish the findings very soon on a unreviewed “pre-print” server so that other researchers and members of the public can see them and discuss their implications. They also intend to send samples to an independent lab for validation, though they do not believe they’re mistaken.”
Kind of an interesting problem. It opens up a lot of questions and a lot of possibilities, none of which i can see as positive outcomes.
Does the body become adjusted to the spike protein antigen over time or does it cause the immune system to continually attack the infection?
How does spike protein synthesis impact antibody-dependent enhancement?
Spike proteins are highly cytotoxic in and of themselves so what are the long term health effects of chronic endogenous spike protein dosing?
How does the immune system treat cells infected with spike protein producing cellular components?
How does chronic endogenous spike protein production impact or interact with other health conditions like auto immune diseases, cancers, conditions related to chronic inlfmatio and blood clotting problems to name just a few.
I had covid right before the shots came out and had to wait the 90 day to get the mRNA shot.
By the time the 90 days has passed there was a lot of evidence that the shots had serious potential side effects, that taking the shots when you already have had covid could cause negative reactions and that the natural immunity from having covid was better than the shots so I passed.
Ironically, getting covid may been a net positive - and while getting covid was bad, I have had much worse infections.
I haven’t seen either a preprint or an abstract yet.
I would really like to know which journal declined to publish their findings...