Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

a MAMMOTH discovery is always huge!


5 posted on 12/18/2024 6:11:20 AM PST by Qwapisking (Q: know the difference between a petulant 6 y.o. and a liberal? A:age. L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Qwapisking

:^) Excavating a fossil mammoth is a grueling tusk.


23 posted on 12/18/2024 6:40:13 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Qwapisking

a MAMMOTH discovery is always huge!


https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/why-the-pygmy-mammoth-stood-at-just-5-feet-tall

In 1873, the geologist Robert Stearns called attention to a single, fossilized tooth on the Channel Islands off the coast of southern California. Despite being considerably small, it bore the distinct ridges of a mammoth tooth — which weren’t known to be among the island’s repertoire of fauna.

By 1928, enough fossils had been found throughout the Channel Islands to make Stearns’ discovery the first of an entirely new species: Mammuthus exilis, or the pygmy mammoth. It’s an apt name for an animal that was abnormally tiny (for a mammoth), standing on average 5 feet 6 inches tall at the shoulder and about 10 times lighter than the larger Columbian mammoths that plodded the mainland.


49 posted on 12/18/2024 8:08:44 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are not longer being issued, but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson