Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: vaskypilot

“The headwind would slow their groundspeed to a crawl, but they proceeded anyway.”

Why didn’t they just go the other way?


5 posted on 12/17/2024 12:49:51 PM PST by HYPOCRACY (Democracy is dead. Long live the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HYPOCRACY

Better to land and take off in a headwind. Even today airports place runways based on prevailing winds. The active runway is based on the better headwind.


6 posted on 12/17/2024 1:01:44 PM PST by vaskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: HYPOCRACY
Why didn’t they just go the other way?

Think about landing that plane at a groundspeed under 10 mph vs. at a groundspeed of around 60 mph. That's why.

18 posted on 12/17/2024 1:16:42 PM PST by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: HYPOCRACY
Why didn’t they just go the other way?

Flying downwind reduces airspeed over the wings. Airspeed over the wings is the vector sum of the aircraft's ground speed and the wind speed. Thus, taking off downwind subtracts from your airspeed, catastrophically reducing lift. Taking off downwind is a good way to turn your nice airplane into a fireball. That's generally frowned upon ...

29 posted on 12/17/2024 2:19:14 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson