In 1674 renovations were being done on the Tower of London. Workmen found the skeletal remains of what appeared to be children underneath the staircase of the White Tower. It was immediately and unequivocally assumed that these remains were that of the two sons of King Edward V.
In 1933 it was decided to re-examine the bones to see if any conclusions or further information could be ascertained. When the urn was openea two partial, Skeletons oT children's remains were found. There were al two skulls, one of which|was badly damaged, in there was also a collection of other miscellaneous bones from different animals: as well as a few rusty nails. So were thee Two bones that were found at the Tower of London REALLY the two princes? For now that centuries old mystery still remains unsolved.Mystery of the Two Princes:
Were the Remains Found at the Tower of London REALLY the Two Princes? | 8:17
Evelyn Edwards | 52.4K subscribers | 11,369 views | March 13, 2024
--> YouTube-Generated Transcript <-- 0:01 · Two boys 12 and 9 years old. Princes. Their father, King Edward IV had just died unexpectedly. 0:16 · The eldest of the two boys Edward, had already been announced as the next king of England 0:22 · in the streets of London. Both boys were placed in the Tower of London - escorted by their 0:30 · uncle, their father's loyal brother Richard. The boy's uncle Richard had been made protector 0:39 · of the 12 year old Edward in his father's will. The death of their father caused a huge 0:45 · power struggle between their mother's family and their Uncle Richard that would ultimately 0:53 · result in their disappearance and their end. Richard had escorted Prince Edward personally 1:01 · to the tower, the idea was that it was for his protection. His younger brother followed 1:09 · shortly after. At the time, none of these actions were considered odd or malicious. 1:17 · The Tower of London was the traditional place that the new monarch would have stayed before 1:22 · their coronation ceremony. But instead of Edward having his coronation as was originally 1:29 · planned for on June 22 1483, his uncle Richard began the process of having Parliament rule 1:39 · that the two princes were actually illegitimate. That their father had been previously betrothed 1:46 · to another woman and so his marriage to their mother was invalid and therefore neither would 1:54 · be in line to inherit the throne - and the next person who should be king was Richard 2:01 · himself. The last records we have of the two princes being seen was written in the Great 2:09 · Chronicle on June 16th that the boys had been "seen shooting [arrows] and playing in the 2:16 · garden of the Tower sundry times.' Then an Italian diplomat not too long after reported 2:25 · a mixture of perhaps gossip and perhaps eyewitness that the princes were "Withdrawn to the 2:32 · inner apartments of the Tower proper, and day by day began to be seen more rarely behind 2:40 · the bars and windows until at length they ceased to appear altogether. Already there 2:48 · is a suspicion that they have been done away with.' In July the two princes' uncle 2:55 · was crowned King Richard III. The boys were never seen again and speculation about what 3:06 · happened to them has been the subject of debate for centuries. The main suspect has always 3:15 · been Richard who had so much to gain with their disappearance. The narrative of what 3:22 · happened to the boys and the possible suspects of the crime were not even introduced for 3:28 · 30 years after their disappearance and it was done by Henry VIIIs chancellor Thomas 3:37 · More. More wrote a dramatic version of what happened in his "The History of King Richard 3:46 · IIII" This manuscript was un-finished and was first published years after More's death. 3:55 · More who's words have ended up massively shaping the narrative of the history of not 4:01 · only Richard III but also the two Princes, was only 7 years old when Richard III died 4:10 · at the Battle of Bosworth. Historians have combed through this posthumous re-telling 4:16 · of events by Moore that originally had frequent misnaming of important figures names, wrong 4:24 · ages given, the use of heresay local gossip and legend as fact is often sited with "as 4:34 · some say" "I have heard by credible report"and "they say". It was More who introduced 4:43 · the idea that a man named Sir James Tyrell and another named Dighton had confessed to 4:51 · murdering the two boys and that the boys were buried underneath stairs at the Tower of London. 5:00 · More also went on to later say that a priest had gone to where the bones had been hidden 5:07 · and reburied them- the location of the of where the priest put the bones was lost because 5:15 · the priest had died. In 1674 renovations were being done on the 5:22 · Tower of London. Workmen found the skeletal remains of what appeared to be children underneath 5:31 · the staircase of the White Tower. It was immediately and unequivocally assumed that these remains 5:39 · were that of the two sons of King Edward IV. The belief was That the finding of these remains 5:48 · corroborated the story that More had presented. The bones were ordered by Charles II, who 5:56 · was king at the time to be taken to Westminster abbey and reinterred. It wasn't until 4 6:05 · years later that in 1678The bones were eventually placed in an urn- and urn that again stated 6:15 · that they were the remains of Edward V and his brother and that they had been murdered 6:22 · by their uncle Richard. In 1933 it was decided to re-examine the bones to see if any conclusions 6:33 · or further information could be ascertained. When the urn was opened two partial skeletons 6:42 · of children's remains were found. There were two skulls, one of which was badly damaged, 6:50 · there was also a collection of other miscellaneous bones from different animals as well as a 6:58 · few rusty nails. The methods used to determine the ages of two skeletons in the 1930's 7:07 · is now considered extremely controversial, even the sex of the remains was not established. 7:16 · There were also multiple other sets of children's bones that have been found that could possibly 7:23 · be the bones of the two princes. There were remains found when Sir Walter Raleigh was 7:30 · imprisoned in the Tower, there remains found when the tower's moat was drained in the mid 7:36 · nineteenth century and more still in 1789 when two small child size coffins were were 7:45 · found walled up in a 'hidden space' next to the vault holding the coffins of Edward IV 7:53 · and Elizabeth Woodville at Windsor Castle. So were the bones that were found at the Tower 8:02 · of London REALLY the two princes? For now that centuries old mystery still remains unsolved.
I remember, in the early 1960s, two bodies were found of a boy and girl. They were put on exhibit for a while before being reburied.
It was said they were of Royal Blood, and had been married to each other when about 5 or 6 years old, then they disappeared.
Anyone else remember it?
BTTT