Your opinion is not law!
“Your opinion is not law!”
Correct, my opinion is not law. The thing is, it’s completely rational for the situation that the people that have committed the crimes deserve. Justice must be done, and the voice of the people must be heard, or there is no Republic. That’s the way it is, so think about the realities and what you really want for your nation. Do you want a Constitutional Republic? There can be only one solution for what these people have done and since the actions had long reaching effects on many real ‘civilians’ the venue for their trails must be fair. Every State has a claim of injury from there actions. The 100k per year that died from Fentanyl overdoses families have a say. Economic devastation loams, the damage is nationally obvious. There was mass murder committed by their ‘illegal actions’ using TS clearances and government positions to support a non-democratic government.
Extreme measures will test the law. Believe me when I tell you that the public will want Justice, the SCOTUS will want Justice, the families of the Dead want Justice. The crimes effected a nation, were done while employees of the people, and should get ‘special’ attention.
Nope, sometimes crimes of conspiracy, illegal activity, and mass murder require another kind of process. Think Nuremburg. These individuals require ‘special’ attention. What happened with the agencies, the corruption, the use of government resources to attack and threaten the ‘People’ is going to require ‘special’ attention. Expect a ‘New’ process for Justice, but expect Justice.
By the way, if what I believe to be true about the activities of these agencies and actors, what stops the POTUS from declaring Martial Law to deal with the bad actors. Who does hearing for these ‘employees’ under those terms? Wiki “Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution states, “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.” There have been many instances of the use of the military within the borders of the United States, such as during the Whiskey Rebellion and in the South during the Civil Rights Movement, but those acts are not tantamount to a declaration of martial law. Deployment of troops does not necessarily mean that the civil courts cannot function, which is one of the keys,[vague] as the US Supreme Court noted,[citation needed] to martial law.In United States law, martial law is limited by several court decisions that were handed down between the American Civil War and World War II. In 1878, Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids US military involvement in domestic law enforcement without congressional approval.”
Expect Congressional approval......