Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 12/01/2024 Vol.502, Q Day 2591

https://qalerts.net/ 12/01/2024 | FReeQs, FReepers, LurQers and Vanity ^ | 12/1/2024 | Ransomnote

[foldspace]

Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see. 

3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022

>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!

Q

In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.

Where We Go 1, We Go All

[Reily]

It’s going C. And the speed of light is not reachable for a physical object, it’s always going some fraction less.

[thinden]

The shirt is for German industrial band KMFDM. They were huge in the club scene 1989 - 1996 or so. Similar to Nine Inch Nails, Ministry, etc. Surprised she’s wearing a shirt for a band that’s my generation.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

what is the source that’s making these tee’s for sale?

[WildHighlander57]

Bkmk.

[BBB333]

If a ship could achieve C — then how fast is the beam of light?

[Reily]

If pigs had wings they could fly!

Assuming pigs have wings it’s still C!

[BBB333]

Ok then, the beam is traveling at ‘C’ while the craft is traveling at ‘C’ — effective to an observer on the ground the beam is traveling at 2 C — C + C.

[ponygirl]

I have no idea, those tees could be sold anywhere. I’ve noticed a lot of kids lately wearing “vintage” or reproduced tees with 90s bands on them. Nirvana, Pearl Jam, Siouxsie, NIN, etc. a Starbucks I sometimes go to is right next to a high school and the kids go there after school lets out. I often see them wearing those shirts there and wonder if they really know the bands or are just wearing fashion.

[ponygirl]

As an aside, I can’t really blame them for looking into vintage music, as their choices for music these days really stink. But it’s really no different from kids wearing Jimi Hendrix tees when I was in high school.

However, I was not aware of the link between Columbine and KMFDM, so there could be something there, I don’t know. There are probably dark web spaces that idolize those two social rejects.

[thinden]

However, I was not aware of the link between Columbine and KMFDM, so there could be something there, I don’t know. There are probably dark web spaces that idolize those two social rejects.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

you might be on to something

[Reily]

An observer on the ground would see an infinitely thin (in the direction of travel) stationary spacecraft with infinite mass. Since its infinitely thin and with infinite mass the ground observer would see nothing. I guess it would be something like a black hole.

Much of this isn’t discussible because at infinities it isn’t definable!

[Reily]

Its effectively manipulating nonsense to create more nonsense!

Wolfgang Paulis’s quote - “Not even wrong!”

[thinden]

just saw DS apparatchik kirby on faux news this morning spinning the “safe drone” narrative to fast that I thought he was going to turn into butter.

[Farcesensitive]

It isn’t discussible because it isn’t logical or sensible.

If all movement and acceleration is relative then C cannot be a constant.

If I shine light in the opposite direction of earth’s movement through space then the light is moving C+Earth’s movement relative to earth, and any light Earth moves towards that comes to Earth from the direction Earth is moving moves at C-Earth’s movement relative to Earth.

Relativity claims that objects that accelerate move at a different rate through time, but it doesn’t say what they accelerate relative to.
If a rocketship accelerates away from Earth then according to Relativity Earth accelerates away from the rocketship as well, so either one does the accelerating or both do some fraction of the acceleration, and you can’t say which one moves through time at a different speed.

Relativity is pure nonsense meant to obscure scientific truth so that the cabal can keep the real science for themselves.

Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz say discussing when they met with White House officials to discuss AI safety, the WH Officials said they could classify any area of math that they think is leading in a bad direction to make it a state secret and “it will end”, they said that they did this in the nuclear era, turning disruptive math/physics into state secrets, and that they can do this again with AI.
https://x.com/TheProjectUnity/status/1814180209278525604

[Melian]

[foldspace]

Let’s say the speed of light is ‘C’ [from E = M x C2] and I’m in a spacecraft going ‘C’ — the speed of light — and we illuminate a searchlight or a laser facing forward from the front of our ship, how fast is the light beam or laser beam going?

Answer If you are in a spacecraft traveling at the speed of light C and you illuminate a searchlight or fire a laser forward, here's what happens according to the theory of relativity:

Light always travels at C relative to any observer
in a vacuum. This is one of the fundamental postulates of Einstein's theory of special relativity.

From your perspective inside the spacecraft, the light from the searchlight or the laser beam would still travel away from you at the speed of light C. You would not perceive it as moving any faster than C because no matter how fast you're moving, light in a vacuum always travels at C.

However, to an external observer at rest relative to your initial frame of reference (like someone on Earth), the light would still be moving away from them at C, not at C + C or 2C. This is because the speed of light is invariant; it's the same for all observers regardless of their motion relative to the source.

The key concept here is that:

Addition of velocities doesn't work simply in relativistic physics
the way it does in classical mechanics. If you were moving at C (which in itself is a theoretical impossibility since anything with mass can't reach C due to infinite energy requirements), and you shone a light forward, the light wouldn't go at C + C from an external observer's viewpoint. Instead, the light would still move at C from that observer's perspective.

In reality,
no object with mass can actually travel at the speed of light, so this scenario is purely hypothetical. But within the constraints of special relativity, the speed of light remains C for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. Therefore, the speed of the light beam or laser beam would still be C, not faster.

- Grok 2

[numberonepal]

General and Special Relativity assumes C is a constant. It is not. GR is a thought experiment and not much more.

[numberonepal]

Correct. See:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4281822/posts?page=3076#3076

[foldspace]

Here's a more concise rundown of key experiments validating General Relativity:

1919 Solar Eclipse -
Light from stars was seen bending around the Sun during an eclipse, confirming gravitational lensing.

Mercury's Orbit -
Explained the extra precession not accounted for by Newton's laws.

Hafele-Keating -
Atomic clocks in airplanes confirmed time dilation due to gravity and speed.

Gravitational Redshift -
Showed light loses energy climbing out of a gravitational well.

LIGO's Gravitational Waves -
Detected waves from black hole mergers, proving their existence.

Shapiro Delay -
Radar signals to planets showed light slows near massive objects.

Binary Pulsar -
Energy loss in binary systems matched predictions for gravitational wave emission.

Galaxy Cluster Lensing -
Light bending by clusters confirms spacetime curvature.

Gravity Probe B -
Measured frame-dragging and geodetic effects around Earth.

Cassini's Radio Signals -
Proved how gravity affects light's path near the Sun.

- Grok 2

[Farcesensitive]

It is impossible to move at the same speed relative to other objects which are moving at different speeds.

C as a universal relative constant contradicts Relativity and turns physics into nonsense.

[foldspace]

Here is a concise list of some of the key experimental verifications of general relativity, based on the available web results:

Precession of Mercury's Perihelion -
Einstein's theory accurately predicted the observed anomaly in Mercury's orbit.

Gravitational Deflection of Light (Eddington's Solar Eclipse) -
During the 1919 solar eclipse, the bending of starlight by the Sun's gravity was measured, matching Einstein's predictions.

Gravitational Redshift -
The Pound-Rebka experiment confirmed the redshift of light in Earth's gravitational field using the Mössbauer effect.

Gravitational Time Dilation -
Verified by comparing atomic clocks at different heights in the Harvard tower (Pound-Snider experiment) and later through GPS satellite clock adjustments.

Shapiro Time Delay -
The delay of radar signals passing near the Sun was confirmed, supporting general relativity's prediction of light travel time in a gravitational field.

Gravitational Lensing -
Observations of galaxy clusters and quasars showing light bending around massive objects.

Binary Pulsar PSR 1913+16 -
The Hulse-Taylor binary pulsar provided evidence for gravitational wave emission through orbital decay, matching theoretical predictions.

Frame-Dragging (Gravitomagnetism) -
Demonstrated by the Gravity Probe B experiment, which measured the twisting of spacetime caused by Earth's rotation.

Nordtvedt Effect -
Lunar laser ranging experiments testing the equivalence principle, showing no measurable difference between inertial and gravitational mass.

Gravitational Waves Detection -
Direct detection by LIGO in 2015 confirmed the existence of gravitational waves, a key prediction of general relativity.

Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Anisotropies -
Observations supporting the cosmological model based on general relativity.

Gravitational Redshift in White Dwarfs -
Spectral line shifts observed in Sirius B and other white dwarfs.

Tests of the Equivalence Principle -
Various experiments like Eötvös, showing equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass.

Orbital Decay of Neutron Star Binaries -
Additional binary systems beyond the Hulse-Taylor pulsar showing energy loss consistent with gravitational wave emission.

Relativistic Jet Precession in SS 433 -
Observations of the precession in the jets of this microquasar match predictions from general relativity.

This list, while not exhaustive, covers some of the most significant and well-known experiments and observations that have confirmed aspects of general relativity. Note that compiling a definitive "top 100" list would require a more comprehensive review beyond the scope of the provided references.