Posted on 11/24/2024 2:57:09 PM PST by airdalechief
CNN fears Pam Bondi because she’s “competent” and, as such, is “dangerous.” Usually, competent is a good thing, but maybe not for CNN. It would explain a lot about the network.
“We should all fear her because she’s competent,” said CNN analyst Jason Johnson.
“We may not agree with her ideologically, but she actually knows how to do this job. So, if anyone on the Democratic side, or anyone who cared about liberty or justice, was thinking, well, maybe Matt Gaetz will screw this up, and that will give us some time. No, Pam Bondi knows what she’s doing.
(Excerpt) Read more at independentsentinel.com ...
“She is a dangerous and effective pick, and that’s frankly, worse than what we would have got with Matt Gaetz, even with the deplorable moral background that he has…”
(CNN “Fears” Pam Bondi Because She’s “Competent”)
EXCELLENT!!!
Trump threw Matt Gatez into dat briar patch!
It is the height of hypocrisy being lectured by liberals about morality
CNN is in the process of dissolving. Their guilty conscience crowd can start heading for the tall grass. One way people who aren’t in love with foreign freeloaders can get rid of the illegals is to shut all the freebies off. MAKE THEM MOVE TO SANCTUARY CITY CRAPPERS to get them.
Gaetz didn't, Bondi does, which is why the Dems would rather have had Gaetz.
Gaetz will be better as a ruthless Special Prosecutor. He’ll be focused on one or two “targets” and will have time and energy to be relentless.
If AG, there’s a lot of administrative folderol that he might not do well or want to do. Spending 100% of time prosecuting could be perfect for him.
Having spent two-years fighting the lies that Pam Bondi facilitated on behalf of her friend, Benjamin Crump; and knowing that Pam Bondi did appear in court in an attempt to stop the defense attorneys for George Zimmerman from questioning the construction of false witness #8 manufactured by Benjamin Crump; and with full acceptance that Pam Bondi did intentionally, willfully and with specific intent attempt to use the power of her office to assist in the malicious and wrongful prosecution of a transparently innocent man, I shall speak no more about the matter. {CITATION HERE}That said, let it be known, that if any innocent person is ever the target of a weaponized power of local, state or federal prosecution, I will not hesitate to rise steadfast in their defense in each and every situation.
With love to all,
~ Sundance
The kind of lawyers the targets of his investigations would have would run rings around him. Doesn't matter how smart he is - there are a lot of nuances to Federal criminal law that it takes years for even the brightest to learn.
Maybe he can assemble a kick-ass group of attorneys who DO have the experience and will be merciless in prosecuting the bad guys.
Running teams of lawyers is not a general management skill. That's why law firms don't have non-legal CEOs managing cases with teams of lawyers under them. The lawyers who run large cases and large investigations are the ones with the most legal knowledge and experience because they're the ones who have to make the critical decisions.
I mean, you could set him up as basically figurehead who just does whatever his Momorere knowledgeable subordinates tell him to do, but what's the point of that?
Running teams of lawyers is not a general management skill. That's why law firms don't have non-legal CEOs managing cases with teams of lawyers under them. The lawyers who run large cases and large investigations are the ones with the most legal knowledge and experience because they're the ones who have to make the critical decisions.
I mean, you could set him up as basically figurehead who just does whatever his more knowledgeable subordinates tell him to do, but what's the point of that?
“He lacks the knowledge to make the intelligent strategic decisions necessary to employ a team of experienced attorneys effectively.”
You don’t know that. Now you’re just being silly.
And that's not even mentioning the massive difference between civil and criminal law. I've run some pretty large civil cases, but I'd be committing malpractice if I tried to run a major federal criminal investigation. And any decent, honest lawyer who knows his stuff would say the same.
It would be like putting a 3rd year plumber in as the lead electrical subcontractor on a multi-billion dollar building. He might be the greatest plumber who ever lived, but he's not going to be able to do plan and run that electrical. And I don't have to meet him personally to know that is true.
Pam Bondi as Attorney General. Sounds good.
Her first move will be to appoint Matt Gaetz as special investigator.
Can you imagine the heads exploding at that point?
special prosecutor or special investigator? i’m not sure which.
either way, i hope Pam appoints him...
just to see the libs, and the deep state, lose their collection sh*t
“ which is why the Dems would rather have had Gaetz.”
I am laughing as I think that the libs/leftists did this to themselves.
Here we go again squishy. Matt Gaetz would have kicked ass and taken name. As for Barbie? I have zero faith in her.
Losers think you can "uncorrupt" the DOJ. You cannot uncorrupt anything, once a thing is corrupt that thing must be destroyed and rebuilt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.