[MtnClimber]

I don’t think it is the job of the unicorn worshippers to use government force to shape anything.

[MtnClimber]

Manhattan Contrarian Ping

[FLT-bird]

All of the above with subsidies for none.

Which effectively means goodbye Gaia Worship because we all know Wind and Solar can’t compete without massive subsidies.

[Codeflier]

I partially agree and partially disagree. Energy diversification for the sake of carbon emission reduction is a boondoggle.

Energy diversification for developing robust energy sources and global independence falls under the umbrella of national security to me. Also, it can smooth supply shocks and disruption due to geopolitical upheaval.

[aquila48]

“all of the above” is the right policy as long as each one of us is allowed to freely choose from all of the above.

[arthurus]

Should "allow" but should NOT support all forms of energy development. If wind and solar can be made efficient and cheap enough to compete with traditional forms without government subsidy then so be it. Letting the market decide is the shortest most efficient way to determine what forms of energy production are cheapest and best.

[cpdiii]

Natural Gas and Nuclear is the way to go for cheaper electricity and less pollution. CO2 is plant food not a pollutant. By product of natural gas is H2O and CO2. When CO2 is high plant life flourishes on earth and thus all life flourishes. Geologically speaking we are in a CO2 drought.