Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: absalom01
I think there is a relatively easy way to find out who's right in this debate.

Amazon should institute a "pay at risk" or performance-based incentive/bonus system that sets annual performance goals for the enterprise (e.g., share price, ROCE, etc.), for each major department (e.g., budget, profit/cost center goals, etc.), and for each division/team (e.g., projects delivered on-time/on budget, budget/cost metrics, etc.), with bonus percents of salary attached to each level.

At the end of the year, each employee receives the percent of salary for each level of metric that has been achieved. If teams miss their goals and do not receive their associated incentive pay, then they have only themselves to look for reasons why. If teams that work 5 days in the office are meeting their performance goals while teams that work-from-home do not, then team peer pressure will drive performance norms for the following year.

-PJ

16 posted on 11/01/2024 12:29:59 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

Good approach—those who perform should make the rules—not a bunch of jerk dictatorial managers.

I am in favor of working at home but if the numbers went the other way then I would be fine with it.


27 posted on 11/01/2024 2:22:22 PM PDT by cgbg ("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson