Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: packrat35
Why should the long ago brutality and slaughter of whites during the slave rebellion in Haiti be considered a greater and more enduring crime than the 350,000 deaths that the slaves suffered in the same rebellion? That rebellion ended in 1804 when Haiti's independence was effectively conceded by Napoleon.

In 1825 though, the successor Bourbon regime in France sent a fleet of gunboats to Haiti and demanded a massive indemnity based not on French lives lost but on the value of the slaves and their earnings lost to France. In return, Haiti was recognized by France and not attacked. With defaults and refinancing, impoverished Haiti had to make payments until 1947, a cumulatively crushing burden that did great and enduring damage to Haiti's development.

If there is such a thing as an odious debt, that qualifies. Modern France is correctly embarrassed by the subject.

58 posted on 10/30/2024 1:47:17 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Rockingham

Apparently you are not understanding what I am saying. They won their freedom...yeah!! Now lets kill white women and children.

Do you NOT see how other governments would respond to that? Can you not see how France would respond to that? Yes, they would get their pound of flesh and they did.

I am not saying it was right, to burden Haiti like that. I am saying why it happened and why Haiti remains a cesspool to this day and WILL ALWAYS BE!


59 posted on 10/30/2024 2:16:49 PM PDT by packrat35 (Pureblood! No clot shot for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson