It was when they'd report that no WMD's were found yet because Bush lied. Then they'd report that our troops were attacked with sarin gas because Bush was too incompetent to protect our troops. Then a day or two later they'd report no WMD's found in Iraq -- hoping their readers/viewers would completely forget that they had recently reported as news that our troops were attacked by sarin gas -- because Bush lied about WMD's. They'd then report that our troops were attacked by mustard gas because of Bush. Then again say no WMD's in Iraq cuz Bush lied.
I realized that the drive by media didn't have to keep their lies straight; They expected their readers/viewers to follow along like sheep without the slightest critical thinking skills. Basically, the biased media had trained their cult followers to just accept whatever "news" they were told even when it was obviously a lie.
It goes back to at least FDR. They covered up he was an invalid pre-war. Not just some, all.