A: The moment they are broadcasted...
50 years ago...
No one... and I mean NO ONE... goes into journalism because they just want to be objectively informative.
People are attracted to influence.
If you ask them why they got into it, they will almost always include something like “I just wanted to make a difference”.
That is just another way of saying that they wanted to shape how people look at things.
it was only in 1889 that the American States decided to meet periodically and to forge a shared system of norms and institutions. There were, in the meantime, conferences and meetings that attempted to give birth to the system, but it was only at the invitation of the Government of the United States that the process began that was to continue uninterruptedly until this day...
There's more. You should read it but I want to get here...https://www.oas.org/en/iachr/mandate/Basics/declaration.asp where it is written...
The Ninth International Conference of American States
AGREES:
To adopt the following
AMERICAN DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF MAN
Preamble
All men are born free and equal, in dignity and in rights, and, being endowed by nature with reason and conscience, they should conduct themselves as brothers one to another.
The fulfillment of duty by each individual is a prerequisite to the rights of all. Rights and duties are interrelated in every social and political activity of man. While rights exalt individual liberty, duties express the dignity of that liberty.
Duties of a juridical nature presuppose others of a moral nature which support them in principle and constitute their basis.
Inasmuch as spiritual development is the supreme end of human existence and the highest expression thereof, it is the duty of man to serve that end with all his strength and resources.
Since culture is the highest social and historical expression of that spiritual development, it is the duty of man to preserve, practice and foster culture by every means within his power.
And, since moral conduct constitutes the noblest flowering of culture, it is the duty of every man always to hold it in high respect.
and that's only the preamble.
I was looking for the SFBs behind it back in 1889 (and I got my suspicions), UNfounded as yet but did learn who the OAS U.S. Ambassador is Francisco_O._Mora
If you're wondering what's the big deal or whydja start down this rabbit hole, I was thinking earlier tonight about reading about the UN commission on migrants here on FR back in 1998 and went looking for the UN paperwork on the members of of that commission; instead the search engine served up https://cidh.oas.org/Migrantes/migrantes98eng.htm
The Declaration of Santiago, adopted by the Heads of State and Government participating in the Second Summit of the Americas, reasserts that "respect for and promotion of human rights and the fundamental freedoms of all individuals is a primary concern of our governments." To this end, it was decided to make a special effort to "guarantee the human rights of all migrants, including migrant workers and their families.”
In the Plan of Action of the Second Summit of the Americas, the Heads of State and Government agreed, among other things, to "seek full compliance with, and protection of, the human rights of all migrants, including migrant workers, and their families, and adopt effective measures, including the strengthening of public awareness, to prevent and eradicate violations of human rights and eliminate all forms of discrimination against them, particularly racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance.”
Furthermore, the Plan of Action indicates that the states will "support the activities of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights with regard to the protection of the rights of migrant workers and their families, particularly through the Special Rapporteur for Migrant Workers.”
What pisses me off is these past forty years of increasing national concerns about the invasion looks to me like politicians have been playing US for suckers for that long because somebody retired our Constitution but hasn't told US yet. They show US pictures of the enemies crowded at the border gates but our dangerous enemies are the politicians at every level controlled by our overseers
https://www.rbf.org/about/about-us/timeline https://rockinst.org/issue-area/what-are-the-most-effective-policies-in-reducing-gun-homicides/
https://www.rbf.org/about/our-history/timeline/planned-parenthood
https://www.ssrc.org/programs/the-mercury-project/
If you're going to ask me what are we supposed to do about it my answer is to take them seriously. That might sound trite but we have to start somewhere.
They did.
David Rockefeller addressed a Trilateral Commission meeting in 1991 with these words:
We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications, whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years.
(Kent 2005, p. 66)
Kent, Deirdre. 2005. Healthy Money Healthy Planet: Developing Sustainability Through New Money Systems. Nelson, New Zealand: Craig Potton
https://cognitive-liberty.online/david-rockefeller-thanks-the-media/