Skip to comments.
For The Post, the wrong choice at the worst possible time
The Washington Post ^
| 10/25/2024 8:21 PM EDT
| Ruth Marcus
Posted on 10/25/2024 8:46:33 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Google for a pic of this bloated, commie heifer. She looks precisely as one would imagine a “Karen” would.
21
posted on
10/26/2024 12:49:28 AM PDT
by
Rocco DiPippo
(Either the Deep State destroys America or we destroy the Deep State. -Donald Trump)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
From that experience, I can say: you win some and lose some.Some you win and some you lose
Your preference they didn't choose.
Panties all twisted in a knot
Often cause the brain to rot.
Liberal tears are raining down
Puddles gather in the town.
Children stomp them with their boot
Watching them do so is such a hoot.
22
posted on
10/26/2024 3:25:35 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Newspapers should not be endorsing political candidates at all if they want to be seen as objective observers who are simply "calling balls and strikes".
I never quite understood the notion of presidential endorsements from newspapers, but I guess since it is technically coming from the editorial board there is a theoretical separation from the journalistic side, but it still doesn't seem like something that an actual "news" outlet should be doing IMHO.
23
posted on
10/26/2024 4:46:23 AM PDT
by
American Infidel
(Instead of vilifying success, try to emulate it)
To: CatOwner
And waste 40 years of propagandizing to a shrinking readership?
If the value of the Post declines much more, Elon Musk should buy it.
24
posted on
10/26/2024 5:35:58 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(“Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out” —David Horowitz)
To: Gnome1949
Well I for one was going to vote for kalama but after the Posts non endorsement I’m switching to Hit...er Trump.
25
posted on
10/26/2024 6:37:48 AM PDT
by
subterfuge
(I'm a pure-blood!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
From Ruth Marcus at the Washington Post, "Last month marked my 40th year of proud work for the institution..."
Imagine living life so morally bankrupt and intellectually deficient that she's proud of that.
Forty years of it. Forty years. Forty years of depraved indifference to her own life while escaping into soulless propaganda work for a syndicate.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“40th year of proud work”
There are only two possible reasons she is proud of working for that CIA controlled propaganda trash outlet:
—She is evil.
—She is stupid.
27
posted on
10/26/2024 7:17:58 AM PDT
by
cgbg
("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
To: silverleaf
If the value of the Post declines much more, Elon Musk should buy it. I would hope Musk wouldn't want to lose money on such a purchase. Beyond that, good luck finding enough journalists who are even close to being fair and balanced.
28
posted on
10/26/2024 8:10:00 AM PDT
by
CatOwner
(Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson