Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: algore
The extra redundant sensor was an option that the airlines in this case declined.

That does not jive with what I recall of the problem. My recollection is that Boeing simply did not build it into the system. You couldn't get one with a redundant sensor in it. They were all built with one sensor.

16 posted on 10/24/2024 1:11:05 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Nope. The extra sensor was part of an options package. When ti should have been standard and required for obvious reasons. And that is just the tip of iceberg on the stupidity Boeing design on that aircraft. I believe that one of the design flaws still exists. The “STAB” switch does not have a position to cancel all computer control and still have Electric control from the yoke.


19 posted on 10/24/2024 2:00:30 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/03/boeing-sold-safety-feature-that-could-have-prevented-737-max-crashes-as-an-option/


22 posted on 10/24/2024 2:25:50 PM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson