A ‘study’ based on data association with a minuscule cohort , no control group, thousand of confounding factors and insignificant risk factor is not a study, it’s junk science like all modern epidemioly.
Pfas are inert, the very reason why they are called ‘eternal chemicals’ (about the only thing the fear mongerers have it right) and are found in concentrations of ppb (one drop per olympic size pool).
They are no less safe than glasswares (lead) or metal ustensils (copper or alloys toxicity) or bisphenol (banned for zero scientific reason).
The constant ‘chemicals” hysteria is a ridiculous and stupid modern superstition, alongside the climate hysteria.
Enough with the greenies nonsense.
—> Pfas are inert
Perplexity AI disagrees.
“ PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are not completely inert. While some PFAS molecules are considered chemically inert due to the lack of active groups, others have reactive sites that can interact with biological systems.
“The dangers of PFAS stem from their persistence in the environment and human body, leading to potential health risks. PFAS exposure has been linked to liver damage, immune system suppression, low birth weight, and increased cholesterol levels.
“They are also associated with cancers and other health issues, making them a significant environmental and health concern.”
You can ingest my allotment. I’ll pass.