Now let me get this straight: it’s ok to explicitly equate one candidate to men who directly ordered the horrendous deaths of millions of people (Hitler,) or a couple of tens of millions (Stalin), and indirectly caused the deaths of maybe 100 million more. But comparing his opponent’s policies to poop is out of
Bounds? Ok. Got it
New York Times worry about tea party protesters being called tea baggers. Apparently that’s a homosexual insult that I didn’t even know existed. But the Times was OK with it.